
Foreword
Andy Wightman
The publication of this third set of case studies is further evidence of the strength
and diversity of the not-for-profit landowning sector in Scotland. Not only does it
demonstrate new energy and initiative, but it also provides a valuable reminder that the
current upsurge of interest in the topic is nothing new. It is merely the latest
manifestation of a centuries-old belief that the land is for the people.
So it is welcome that the legacy of Gladstone and Lloyd George is drawn to our
attention by the case study of Glendale Estate on the Isle of Skye. Glendale is seldom
mentioned in discussions about community landownership these days, perhaps because it is
perceived to be a failure. The model of a shareholding company owning crofting land has
been rejected by recent crofting buyouts in favour of the company without share capital.
Glendale, however, is no different from many community initiatives where individuals buy
and sell their homes and move in and out of the community. Perhaps it is time to re-assess
the Glendale experience.
The study of Forres reminds us of forms of communal property ownership (commonties and
common good land funds) that pre-date the initiatives of the late nineteenth century. Much
of the land held in these ways was lost in the past through appropriation by private
interests and the ineptitude and corruption of municipal politics. It is part of the
dismal story of landownership in Scotland, of which the latest manifestation is the
Cuillin on Skye, the eastern part of which is almost certainly a Crown Common.
At a time when the Government is promoting the concept of community landownership
through an ineffectual and dishonest piece of legislation, it is worth being reminded of
this history of communal ownership and of the achievements of more radical legislation
promoted by earlier governments. Although Government has been responsible for creating a
decisive shift in public opinion and policy on the question of land reform, and deserves
credit for doing so, it still lacks any sense of the bigger picture.
Whilst initiatives such as the Community Land Unit and the Scottish Land Fund are
welcome and worthwhile, the land for the people - a landowning democracy - is still some
way in the future. Meanwhile, as these case studies demonstrate, the citizens' sector gets
on with what it does best - making a difference at the local level. It deserves great
credit for its efforts.
