
Community Involvement at Portmoak Moss and Kilmagad Wood
Andrew Fairbairn

This case study explores how Woodland Trust Scotland (WTS) has worked with a local
community to acquire two woods in Perth and Kinross, providing the opportunity for local
people to become involved in the conservation of their environment. It also examines the
processes which have led to successful management of the woods through a partnership
between the community and WTS.

WTS was established in 1984, 12 years after the Woodland Trust (WT) was founded. WT is
the foremost conservation organisation dedicated to the conservation of the UK's native
woodland. It achieves its purposes in two ways: through the acquisition of woodland and
sites for woodland regeneration; and also through wider advocacy of the importance of
protecting ancient woodland, enhancing its biodiversity, expanding native woodland cover
and increasing public enjoyment. WT currently owns and manages over 1,000 sites across the
United Kingdom. All woods are certified under the Forest Stewardship Council's UK Standard
of Sustainable Forestry - an independent endorsement of the quality of woodland
management.
WTS manages 77 sites totalling 7,000 hectares. These include nationally and
internationally important woodland sites, in addition to urban and community woods. Nearly
all of WTS's sites are freely open for the public to enjoy (although access is not
encouraged where an intrinsic safety issue exists).

The two woods - Portmoak Moss and Kilmagad Wood - are situated adjacent to the villages
of Scotlandwell and Kinnesswood, close to Loch Leven, in Perth and Kinross. The immediate
community numbers about 2,000 people, most of whom are employed in agriculture or the
professions. Within a five mile radius lie Milnathort and Kinross which have a similar
socio-economic make-up and a combined population of approximately 10,000, and also
Ballingry and Lochore, ex-coal mining areas where unemployment is high, with a combined
population of 15,00 people.

Portmoak Moss is a former Forestry Commission commercial woodland consisting largely of
a plantation of spruce and pine. The wood extends to 42 hectares and has been planted on a
raised bog or moss to which the local residents have historically had access in order to
cut peat for domestic fuel. The ground under the densely planted conifers is dark and bare
of any vegetation due to lack of light, whereas in the more open areas mosses and ferns
thrive as well as plants such as foxglove, wood sorrel, orchid and the unusual
'lords-and-ladies' with its spike of orange berries. Twenty-two species of bird have been
recorded breeding in the wood, including long-eared owl, green and great spotted
woodpecker, goldcrest and siskin.

In 1995, Portmoak Moss was placed on the Forestry Commission's disposal list. This
action prompted concerns within the communities of Scotlandwell and Kinnesswood who shared
a strong desire to retain access rights to a place of high amenity value. The perceived
threat was that the access local people enjoyed under the Forestry Commission's ownership
would not be guaranteed under private ownership. Representatives of the two communities
approached the Woodland Trust requesting a partnership acquisition, with the Trust taking
legal responsibility for ownership of the site.
WTS was able to commit itself to the acquisition of the wood because one of WT's five
WT criteria for acquiring any wood is "importance to a local community." In
addition, it acknowledged, as did the community, the advantages of the combination of
community participation and the security of long-term ownership by a known land-owning
charity in terms of accessing grant aid.
An appeal was launched in partnership with the community. WTS secured grant aid from
Scottish Natural Heritage and the National Heritage Memorial Fund, while local people
raised an impressive 25 per cent of the acquisition costs, including £10,000 from Perth
and Kinross Council which matched local fund-raising pound for pound.
This joint funding package enabled Portmoak Moss to be acquired by WTS in February 1996
at a cost of £80,000. Karen MacDonnell of the Portmoak Moss Appeal stated at the time,
"We never had any doubt that we would be able to reach the community target but we
have been astounded by how quickly things have happened." At the time of the
acquisition WTS Officer Jill Aitken said, "It is important that local people are
given the opportunity to help care for the wood in future and the Trust will provide
support to enable them to do this."

A Secretary of State for Scotland once said, "Community woods allow local people
to have a say in their environment and to become practically involved. This inspires a
feeling of ownership and responsibility, re-establishing the bond between people and the
natural environment." WTS endorses this statement, but is also well aware that
achieving the goal of active community involvement in the management of local woodland can
be a complex challenge. Acquiring a threatened wood can often be the easiest piece of the
jigsaw, for everyone is motivated and has a common goal: in the instance of Portmoak Moss
this step was achieved relatively easily. Management of a site is altogether different.
It would be fair to say that initially the community saw WTS as an obstacle to getting
on and doing things in the wood. As the landowner, however, WTS had to ensure compliance
with the appropriate health and safety regulations and training requirements to satisfy
their insurers. As a result it took some time for both local people and WTS to agree a way
forward that was satisfactory for all.
The solution was to improve communications and so allow each party to understand fully
the others' expectations. As a first step a community steering group was set up - the
Portmoak Community Woodland Steering Group (PCWSG), and a draft management plan was
jointly agreed by the group and WTS. To assist the process of mutual learning, the Rural
Development Forestry Programme was invited to carry out a Participatory Rural Appraisal
(PRA) in December 1996 with the following objectives:
 | To facilitate meetings and interactions within a wide cross-section of people in the
locality surrounding Portmoak Moss |
 | To assess current usage of the wood; the ambitions local people had for the Moss; how
they might like to get involved; how they would like to be kept informed about activities
and developments in the wood; and ways in which more people could become involved. |
 | To assist PCWSG and WTS to understand better the views of local people about the
management of the Moss. |
 | To start a process by which local people might come to a better understanding of each
others' ideas and concerns regarding the future of the Moss. |
The PRA collated people's likes and dislikes and suggestions about ways of providing
local information (mainly through local posters and newsletters). It also provided
information about ideas for the future and the ambitions people had for Portmoak. These
included path improvements, clearing exotic species, improving biodiversity, holding
events in the wood and removal of dog fouling. Many other new ideas for the wood came out
of the PRA process.
The management plan was subsequently redrafted, taking account of the detailed PRA
findings. It was then finalised and agreed between WTS and the steering group.1 The PRA
was the catalyst that enabled everyone to have an opportunity to become involved in the
management of the wood and to play a part in providing a mechanism for woodland management
delivery.
The process of producing the management plan and the results of the PRA ensured that
people had clear ideas of what was needed. It was evident that the site had limited
opportunities for enhancing recreation, amenity and wildlife, for reasons identified by
the community during the PRA:
 | the peat surface degrades rapidly once the sward has been breached, resulting in paths
which are 'un-walkable' in wet weather. |
 | lack of management of the plantation had led to a dense tree canopy prone to wind
damage. |
 | the tree canopy inhibits regeneration of native species and ground flora. |
The management plan addressed these issues by including sections on improving access to
the countryside for people of all abilities; and on improving the understanding of the
natural heritage and local culture through interpretation and education.
At the time of writing (February 2001), the PCWSG is formally constituted and meets on
a regular basis. A WTS representative usually attends the monthly meetings. The management
plan (currently under review) enables everyone connected with the wood to be clear about
required management works and how they are to be undertaken. And most importantly,
communication between PCWSG and WTS is frequent and effective.

About a year after the acquisition of Portmoak Moss, Kinross Action Group approached
WTS with the news that a local farmer was willing to sell Kilmagad Wood, which lies within
a mile of Portmoak Moss, to the north of the village of Scotlandwell. Kilmagad covers 27
hectares of hill ground in an Area of Great Landscape Value lying to the north of the A911
Scotlandwell to Kinnesswood road. The land is partially wooded and has been subject to
grazing, which has prevented natural regeneration of the existing tree species such as
oak, rowan, elm, ash, and Scots Pine. The wood has superb views across the Firth of Forth
as far as Edinburgh and beyond. There is a public Right of Way through the wood, which is
a well-established area for walking.
When the idea was put forward, the PCWSG were enthusiastic to acquire and manage
Kilmagad using the Portmoak 'model'. Again there was a joint effort to raise the
acquisition costs of £32,500. WTS secured grant aid from The Gannochy Trust, The Scottish
Executive Rural Challenge Fund and Perth and Kinross Council, while the local community
raised the vital final 10 per cent of the funding package enabling the acquisition of
Kilmagad Wood to proceed in February 1998. The acquisition was supported by the Ramblers
Association Scotland, Perthshire Tourist Board, Perth and Kinross Council, Portmoak
Community Council and Kinross-shire Community Action.
This second purchase provided an appropriate opportunity to extend local involvement in
management of important natural assets, for Kilmagad Wood and Portmoak Moss are linked by
a circular walk (the Tetley Tea Trail) connecting the two villages of Scotlandwell and
Kinnesswood. The trail is promoted by both the Community Council and the local Tourist
Board. Visitor numbers are expected to rise and people counters have been installed at
both sites to assess the impact.

The experience of preparing a management plan for Portmoak Moss assisted greatly in the
development of the Kilmagad plan. The process was similar and much more straightforward
second time round: WTS and PCWSG jointly prepared a draft management plan, and presented
it to a public meeting. A few minor amendments were made and the plan produced.
However, the management of Kilmagad presented different challenges from that of
Portmoak Moss. The Kilmagad Wood plan addresses the need to restore the woodland by
natural regeneration and tree planting and benefits from consultations with SNH about
natural regeneration. Planting has been used to supplement regeneration only where
necessary. Portmoak Primary School have set up a tree nursery using seed collected from
the site, and many of the saplings they have raised have been planted out by the
community.

Immediately following the acquisition of Portmoak, there were some tensions between the
community and WTS - it was a new situation for all. Difficulties arose because of
different expectations and the Trust's obligation to adhere to stringent health and safety
regulations and requirements for insurance purposes. It would be fair to say that
initially people saw WTS as a stumbling block to an immediate implementation of management
works, a programme of events and voluntary work. There is no doubt that the Participatory
Appraisal, combined with the setting-up of the steering group and the management planning
process, has enabled communications to flow more freely with the result that there now
exists a clear understanding of what the objectives for the woods are and how they will be
achieved. Most of the original expectations of both the community and WTS have now been
achieved.
Formalising the relationship between community and WTS provided the group with the
impetus to adopt a constitution which sets out the following aims:
 | To improve public access |
 | To enable community involvement |
 | To improve the diversity of age structure and species of tree with the woods |
 | To promote and enhance the environment for the benefit of the community. |
It is essential to emphasise that both management plans (which are currently being
reviewed) and all the works undertaken at both woods have resulted from a two-way process
between the steering group and WTS. The current review of the management plans is open to
public consultation. The drafts were prepared jointly with the steering group, and the
final plans will be agreed once account has been taken of comments from the wider
community. The process of reviewing and developing the management plans is lead by WTS as
they conform, in format, with all our other plans which are recorded electronically on a
database. This approach has enabled local people to take real decisions and influence the
way in which their local environment is managed without the legal burden of land
ownership.
People have also had the chance to learn new skills. Since the acquisition of Portmoak,
40 volunteer training places have been completed in first aid, small tree felling and
bridge building. One person has obtained a chainsaw certificate and now carries out minor
silvicultural works in both woods. The steering group has acquired a chainsaw mill to make
products from timber extracted from Portmoak. The group also won the Perth and Kinross
"Better Place Award" in 1999, a recognition of their contribution to Local
Agenda 21 and Community Enhancement.
Many other positives have resulted from the partnership approach:
 | Many events are organised each year by the PCWSG, and countless volunteer days are spent
working on improvements in the woods. |
 | School children use the woods as an open-air classroom, learning about their natural
environment and the importance of trees. |
 | Portmoak Guides have achieved the conservation pennant through project work based on
Portmoak Moss. |
 | A new 400 metre path for people with disabilities has been developed at Portmoak, and
was constructed to BT 'Countryside for All' Standards. In all, 1,000 metres of paths have
been upgraded, taking into account the vulnerable nature of the ground. Specifications for
the pathwork came from SNH's Footpath Advice Team. |
 | Exotic trees have been removed from Portmoak Moss to allow for regeneration of native
species. |
 | Natural regeneration and planting areas have been set up at Kilmagad, and local people
have collected seed and planted saplings. |
 | Information boards and display panels, designed for easy reading by the visually
impaired, have been produced and set up in the woods. |
 | Three sculptured seats have been designed and placed in Portmoak Moss. |
 | Visitor surveys are being undertaken at the woods, the results of which will help to
inform future management decisions. |

To improve public access; to enable community involvement; to improve the diversity of
native woodland habitat; and to promote and enhance the environment for the benefit of the
community - these are all aims outlined in the agreed management plans. Since 1996 huge
strides have been taken in the pursuit of these aims.
Although the land is owned by WT, it is managed with a partnership approach and there
are no plans to change that. Where stumbling blocks have appeared, they have been due
largely to inadequate communication and understanding (as explained earlier). These
difficulties have, however, been fully resolved by open debate. It must be emphasised that
since the formation of the steering group and the introduction of the process of jointly
agreeing management plans, stumbling blocks are a thing of the past.
Many practical improvements have been made at each wood. However, there remains much to
do in re-structuring Portmoak to achieve the ultimate aim of creating a wood dominated by
native broadleaved species of tree. At Kilmagad the main focus will be on the
establishment of new woodland areas, now that the agricultural grazing pressure has been
removed. In both woods the dead wood habitat will be retained where practicable.
Day-to-day management works are carried out by a Dollar-based estate maintenance
contractor, and major projects are contracted on a case-by-case basis. Voluntary work is
undertaken by members of the community when they have the necessary skills and
qualifications or when training can be organised. This arrangement is to everyone's
satisfaction at the moment, although WTS would respond positively if the Steering Group
expressed a wish to take a more proactive role in the delivery of all the management
works.
As for the long term, ultimately we are all aiming at the provision of well-managed,
varied habitats with opportunities for public access, improved woodland biodiversity and
amenity value. We also wish to promote the significance of the partnership approach as an
example of what can be achieved through working together. In other parts of the UK,
communities have expressed a wish to take on full management control of woodland owned by
WT and management agreements have been drawn up as a result. One day the PCWSG may wish to
go down this route, although to date they have not expressed the desire to do so. But who
knows what tomorrow will bring?
Note: Reforesting Scotland have used Portmoak CommunityWoodland Steering Group as a
case study for their Community Woodland Network. Copies can be obtained from Reforesting
Scotland (Telephone: 0131 554 43210).

|